The fairest framing is what you're paying the platform to do. Silktide sells a wider product than an accessibility scanner. The training layer, inspector overlay, policy framework, pre-publish CMS hooks, and live-page browser extension all carry value for organisations that will use them. If your team leans on those features, the price tag goes somewhere useful.
If your team will mostly use the tool to find issues and watch them trend, a slimmer scanner does that for far less and stays out of the way of your stack. Most agencies and product teams who switch from Silktide cite that as the actual reason rather than the headline price.
Both tools take the same principled stance on overlays and auto-fix, run scans in real browsers, and produce the same broad shape of accessibility output. The deciding question isn't usually about accessibility coverage. It's about the buying motion and the breadth of platform you actually need.